Comparing OpenSSL with LibreSSL
LibreSSL is a fork (derived code) of OpenSSL that was created in 2014 by the OpenBSD Project as a response to the infamous Heartbleed vulnerability that was found in OpenSSL. LibreSSL was founded to increase the security and maintainability of the library by removing old, unpopular, and no longer secure cryptographic algorithms and other features.
OpenBSD is a Unix operating system, one of the BSD systems family aimed at security. OpenBSD developers do not only develop the operating system kernel and utilities. Another famous software project is OpenSSH. Other software projects started as applications for OpenBSD, such as OpenNTPD, OpenSMTPD, and others. This now includes LibreSSL.
After forking, the LibreSSL developers removed a lot of the original OpenSSL code that they considered old or insecure. They claimed that they removed approximately half of the OpenSSL code within the first week. They also added a few new cryptographic algorithms such as Advanced Encryption Standard in Galois/Counter Mode (AES-GCM) and ChaCha-Poly1305. In addition to adding and removing code, some existing code was reworked and hardened in some places.
Despite LibreSSL’s aim to increase security, there were some vulnerabilities in LibreSSL that did not affect OpenSSL, such as CVE-2017-8301.
In the last few years, OpenSSL also did some work on improving the security and maintainability of the library and deprecated/removed some code – though not as much code was removed as in LibreSSL. However, more code and new features were added.
OpenSSL has much more development resources than LibreSSL, which means it advances much faster. For example, from the end of 2018 until the beginning of 2021, LibreSSL has merged approximately 1,500 patches from 36 developers. During the same time, OpenSSL has merged more than 5,000 patches from 276 developers. Apart from the core OpenSSL development team, OpenSSL receives code contributions from big companies such as Oracle, Red Hat, IBM, and others.
While the focus of LibreSSL is providing a TLS library for the OpenBSD project, it also aims to support other platforms and remain API-compatible with OpenSSL. At the time of writing, the LibreSSL API is compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.1, but does not include all the newest APIs from OpenSSL 1.0.2 and later.
Since its fork from OpenSSL, LibreSSL became the default TLS library on OpenBSD, but on most other operating systems, the adoption has been low. Most Linux distributions continued using OpenSSL, and some decided to try LibreSSL as a system-wide option but decided to drop such support later. Most commercial application vendors that used OpenSSL also decided to stick with it.
In the competition between OpenSSL and LibreSSL, OpenSSL is winning. I recommend that you choose OpenSSL unless you are developing software specifically for the OpenBSD community, in which case you should consider LibreSSL.
Another fork of OpenSSL has been created by the mighty Google corporation, as we’ll explore in the next section.
