Toward the end of 2016 and at the start of 2017, there was a public debate in the GitLab community about whether reverting back from the cloud to bare metal would be cost-effective for GitLab.com. At the time, the filesystem used for repositories was Ceph. The performance of that distributed filesystem was not good enough to handle GitLab.com. They asked the community for advice and received a lot of feedback from people who experienced similar moves firsthand. In the end, the decision was made to stay in the cloud (https://about.gitlab.com/2017/03/02/why-we-are-not-leaving-the-cloud/). Instead, GitLab would focus on creating a solution, not on the filesystem level, but making sure that Git input/output (I/O) behavior is better managed at the application level. This can be seen as the birth of the Gitaly component. Sid Sijbrandij emphasized the importance of being...
United States
Great Britain
India
Germany
France
Canada
Russia
Spain
Brazil
Australia
Singapore
Hungary
Ukraine
Luxembourg
Estonia
Lithuania
South Korea
Turkey
Switzerland
Colombia
Taiwan
Chile
Norway
Ecuador
Indonesia
New Zealand
Cyprus
Denmark
Finland
Poland
Malta
Czechia
Austria
Sweden
Italy
Egypt
Belgium
Portugal
Slovenia
Ireland
Romania
Greece
Argentina
Netherlands
Bulgaria
Latvia
South Africa
Malaysia
Japan
Slovakia
Philippines
Mexico
Thailand