The difference between A2C and A3C is that A2C performs synchronous updates. Here, all the workers will wait until they have completed the collection of experiences and computed the gradients. Only after this are the global (or master) network's parameters updated. This is different from A3C, where the update is performed asynchronously, that is, where the worker threads do not wait for the others to finish. A2C is easier to code than A3C, but that is not undertaken here. If you are interested in this, you are encouraged to take the preceding A3C code and convert it to A2C, after which the performance of both algorithms can be compared.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Germany
France
Canada
Russia
Spain
Brazil
Australia
Argentina
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Chile
Colombia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Hungary
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Ukraine