Search icon CANCEL
Subscription
0
Cart icon
Your Cart (0 item)
Close icon
You have no products in your basket yet
Arrow left icon
Explore Products
Best Sellers
New Releases
Books
Videos
Audiobooks
Learning Hub
Free Learning
Arrow right icon
Arrow up icon
GO TO TOP
Hands-On Neuroevolution with Python

You're reading from   Hands-On Neuroevolution with Python Build high-performing artificial neural network architectures using neuroevolution-based algorithms

Arrow left icon
Product type Paperback
Published in Dec 2019
Publisher Packt
ISBN-13 9781838824914
Length 368 pages
Edition 1st Edition
Languages
Arrow right icon
Author (1):
Arrow left icon
Iaroslav Omelianenko Iaroslav Omelianenko
Author Profile Icon Iaroslav Omelianenko
Iaroslav Omelianenko
Arrow right icon
View More author details
Toc

Table of Contents (18) Chapters Close

Preface 1. Section 1: Fundamentals of Evolutionary Computation Algorithms and Neuroevolution Methods FREE CHAPTER
2. Overview of Neuroevolution Methods 3. Python Libraries and Environment Setup 4. Section 2: Applying Neuroevolution Methods to Solve Classic Computer Science Problems
5. Using NEAT for XOR Solver Optimization 6. Pole-Balancing Experiments 7. Autonomous Maze Navigation 8. Novelty Search Optimization Method 9. Section 3: Advanced Neuroevolution Methods
10. Hypercube-Based NEAT for Visual Discrimination 11. ES-HyperNEAT and the Retina Problem 12. Co-Evolution and the SAFE Method 13. Deep Neuroevolution 14. Section 4: Discussion and Concluding Remarks
15. Best Practices, Tips, and Tricks 16. Concluding Remarks 17. Other Books You May Enjoy

Objective function for a double-pole balancing experiment

The objective function for this problem is similar to the objective function defined earlier for the single-pole balancing problem. It is given by the following equations:

In these equations, is the expected number of time steps specified in the configuration of the experiment (100,000), and is the actual number of time steps during which the controller was able to maintain a stable state of the pole balancer within the specified limits.

We use logarithmic scales because most of the trials fail in the first several 100 steps, but we are testing against 100,000 steps. With a logarithmic scale, we have a better distribution of fitness scores, even compared with a small number of steps in failed trials.

The first of the preceding equations defines the loss, which is in the [0,1] range, and the second is a fitness score...

lock icon The rest of the chapter is locked
Register for a free Packt account to unlock a world of extra content!
A free Packt account unlocks extra newsletters, articles, discounted offers, and much more. Start advancing your knowledge today.
Unlock this book and the full library FREE for 7 days
Get unlimited access to 7000+ expert-authored eBooks and videos courses covering every tech area you can think of
Renews at $19.99/month. Cancel anytime
Banner background image