1.3 Increasing connectivity
Connectivity allows designers to add novel, unique features to their products and enables new business models with huge revenue potential that simply would not exist without it.
At the same time, connectivity makes it much harder to build secure systems. Similar to Ferguson and Schneier’s argument on security implications of complexity, one can say that there are no connected systems that are secure. Why? Because connecting systems to large, open networks like the internet exposes them to remote attacks. Remote attacks – unlike attacks that require physical access – are much more compelling from the attacker’s perspective because they scale.
1.3.1 Connectivity versus security – larger attack surface
While connectivity enables a multitude of desired features, it also exposes products to remote attacks carried out via the internet. Attacks that require physical access to the target device can only be executed by a limited number of attackers who actually have access to that device, for example, employees of a company in the case of devices in a corporate network. In addition, the need for physical access generally limits the attacker’s window of opportunity.
Connectivity, in contrast, exposes electronic devices and IT systems to remote attacks, leading to a much higher number of potential attackers and threat actors. Moreover, remote attacks – unlike attacks that require physical access to the target – are much more compelling from the attacker’s perspective because they scale.
Another aspect that makes remote attacks practical (and, to a certain extent, rather easy) is the fact that the initial targets are almost always the network-facing interfaces of the devices, which are implemented in software. As we have seen, complex software is almost guaranteed to contain numerous implementation bugs, a number of which can be typically exploited to attack the system. Thus, the trend of increasing software and system complexity inadvertently facilitates remote attacks.
1.3.2 Connectivity versus marginal attack cost
Remote attacks are easy to launch – and hard to defend against – because their marginal cost is essentially zero. After a newly discovered security vulnerability is initially translated into a reliably working exploit, the cost of replicating the attack an additional 10, 100, or 100,000 devices is essentially the same, namely close to zero.
This is because remote attacks are implemented purely in software, and reproducing software as well as accessing devices over public networks effectively costs close to nothing. So, while businesses need to operate large – and costly – internal security organizations to protect their infrastructure, services, and products against cybersecurity attacks, any script kiddie can try to launch a remote attack on a connected product, online service, or corporate infrastructure essentially for free.
1.3.3 Connectivity versus scaling attacks
To summarize, connectivity exposes devices and IT systems to remote attacks that target network-facing software (and, thus, directly benefit from the continuously increasing software complexity), are very cheap to launch, can be launched by a large number of threat actors, and have zero marginal cost.
In addition, there exists a market for zero-day exploits [190] that allows even script kiddies to launch highly sophisticated remote attacks that infest target systems with advanced malware able to open a remote shell and completely take over the infested device.
As a result, connectivity creates an attack surface that facilitates cybersecurity attacks that scale.
