Toward the end of 2016 and at the start of 2017, there was a public debate in the GitLab community about whether reverting back from the cloud to bare metal would be cost-effective for GitLab.com. At the time, the filesystem used for repositories was Ceph. The performance of that distributed filesystem was not good enough to handle GitLab.com. They asked the community for advice and received a lot of feedback from people who experienced similar moves firsthand. In the end, the decision was made to stay in the cloud (https://about.gitlab.com/2017/03/02/why-we-are-not-leaving-the-cloud/). Instead, GitLab would focus on creating a solution, not on the filesystem level, but making sure that Git input/output (I/O) behavior is better managed at the application level. This can be seen as the birth of the Gitaly component. Sid Sijbrandij emphasized the importance of being...
United States
United Kingdom
India
Germany
France
Canada
Russia
Spain
Brazil
Australia
Argentina
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Chile
Colombia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Hungary
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Ukraine