GRC for cybersecurity professionals
In this section, we’ll learn about cybersecurity, information assurance, and the difference between these two concepts.
Cybersecurity and information assurance
For non-cybersecurity professionals, the word cybersecurity is synonymous with hacking, but in reality, this could not be further from the truth.
There are various ways to look at cybersecurity from an outsider’s view. In the industry, this is often categorized as a red team (attackers), blue team (defenders), and purple team (a combination of the red team and blue team focusing on collaboration and information sharing). For this book, I will take a different approach that is more aligned with the objectives of this book and your understanding when you prepare for the certification.
Firstly, let’s segregate cybersecurity into two major practices: cybersecurity and information assurance.
In the cybersecurity realm, we consider activities such as penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, network monitoring, malware analysis, and all the other practices that require robust technical understanding and knowledge to prevent unauthorized access and disruption to the business.
The second practice, information assurance, is going to be the focus of this book. Information assurance includes activities such as policy and procedure development, risk assessments and management, data analysis, IT audits, compliance with regulatory frameworks, incident management, vulnerability management, vendor management, KPI and KRI reporting and dashboards, and all the other sub-domains that do not require extensive technical understanding. However, these practices do require thorough collaboration across all teams and a strong understanding of the fundamentals of cybersecurity concepts. These activities are important for complying with multiple federal and state regulations as well as to ensure the implementation of compliance with industry-standard practices.
Many organizations tend to completely segregate the cybersecurity and information assurance functions into different verticals altogether, where the communication between different teams and opportunities to collaborate are limited. This leads to security being seen as a gatekeeper and not an enabler.
As security is continuing to shift left – that is, being prioritized more and more in the initial stages of software development and project viability – this distinction is fading and teams using modern security tools collaborate a lot more than just meeting once a month.
As you continue with this book, you will realize that though the CRISC exam covers all concepts of cybersecurity and information assurance, the focus will primarily be on the latter as the entire purpose of the CRISC exam is to help you prepare for the IT risk management of an organization, regardless of its size.
So far, we have learned about GRC, the importance of GRC, and how to differentiate between different verticals of cybersecurity. In the next section, we’ll learn about the importance of GRC for cybersecurity professionals and industry-standard frameworks to implement a GRC program.
