Search icon CANCEL
Subscription
0
Cart icon
Your Cart (0 item)
Close icon
You have no products in your basket yet
Arrow left icon
Explore Products
Best Sellers
New Releases
Books
Videos
Audiobooks
Learning Hub
Conferences
Free Learning
Arrow right icon

Tech Guides - 3D Printing News

4 Articles
article-image-visit-3d-printing-filament-factory-3dkberlin
Michael Ang
02 Sep 2015
5 min read
Save for later

Visit a 3D printing filament factory - 3dk.berlin

Michael Ang
02 Sep 2015
5 min read
Have you ever wondered where the filament for your 3D printer comes from and how it’s made? I recently had the chance to visit 3dk.berlin, a local filament manufacturer in Berlin. 3dk.berlin distinguishes itself by offering a huge variety of colors for their filament. As a designer it’s great to have a large palette of colors to choose from, and I chose 3dk filament for my Polygon Construction Kit workshop at Thingscon 2015 (they’re sponsoring the workshop). Today we’ll be looking at how one filament producer takes raw plastic and forms it into the colored filament you can use in your 3D printer. Some of the many colors offered by 3dk.berlin 3dk.berlin is located at the very edge of Berlin, in the area of Heiligensee which is basically its own small town. 3dk is a family-owned business run by Volker Bernhardt as part of BERNHARDT Kunststoffverarbeitungs GmbH (that’s German for "plastics processing company"). 3dk is focused on bringing BERNHARDT’s experience with injection moulded and extruded plastics to the new field of 3D printing. Inside the factory neutral-colored plastic pellets are mixed with colored "master batch" pellets and then extruded into filament. The extruding machine melts and mixes the pellets, then squeezes them through a nozzle, which determines the diameter of the extruded filament. The hot filament is run through a cool water bath and coiled on large spools. Conceptually it’s quite simple, but getting extremely consistent filament diameter, color and printing properties is demanding. Small details like air and moisture trapped inside the filament can lead to inconsistent prints. Bigger problems like material contamination can lead to a jammed nozzle in your printer. 3dk spent 1.5 years developing and fine tuning their machine before they were satisfied with the results to a German level of precision. They didn’t let me to take pictures of their extrusion machines since some of their techniques are proprietary but you can get a good view of a similar machine in this filament extrusion machine video. Florian (no small guy himself) with a mega-spool from the extrusion machine The filament from the extrusion machine is wound onto 10kg spools - these are big! The filament from these large spools is then rewound onto smaller spools for sale to customers. 3dk tests their filament on a variety of printers in-house to ensure ongoing quality. Where we might do a small print of 20 grams to test a new filament, 3dk might do a "small" test of 2kg! Test print with a full-size plant (about 4 feet tall) Why produce filament in Germany when cheaper filament is available from abroad? Florian Deurer from 3dk explained some of the benefits to me. 3dk gets their PLA base material directly from a supplier that does use additives. The same PLA is used by other manufacturers for items like food wrapping. The filament colorants come from a German supplier and are also "harmless for food". For the colorants in particular there might be the temptation for less scrupulous or regulated manufacturers to use toxic substances like heavy metals or other chemicals. Beyond safety and practical considerations like printing quality, using locally produced filament provides local jobs What really sets 3dk apart from other filament makers in an increasingly competitive field is the range of colors they produce. I asked Florian for some orange filament and he asked "which one?" The colors on offer range from subtle (there’s a whole selection of whites, for example) to more extreme bright colors and metallic effects. Designers will be happy to hear that they can order custom colors using the Pantone color standard (for orders of 5kg / 11lbs and up).   Which white would you like? Standard, milky, or pearl? Looking to the future of 3D printing, it will be great to see more environmentally friendly materials become available. The most popular material for home 3D printing right now is probably PLA plastic (the same material 3dk uses for most of their filament). PLA is usually derived from corn, which is an annually renewable crop. PLA is technically compostable, but this has to take place in industrial composting conditions at high temperature and humidity. People are making progress on recycling PLA and ABS plastic prints back into filament at home but the machines to make this easy and more common are still being developed. 100% recycled PLA print of Origamix_Rabbit by Mirice printed on an i3 Berlin 3dk offers a filament made from industrially recycled PLA. The color and texture for this material varies a little on the spool but I found it to print very well in my first tests and your object ends up a nice slightly transparent olive green. I recently got a "sneak peek" at a filament 3dk is working on that is compostable under natural conditions. This filament is pre-production, so the specifications haven’t been finalized, but Florian told me that the prints are stable under normal conditions but can break down when exposed to soil bacteria. The pigments also contain "nothing bad" and break down into minerals. The sample print I saw was flexible with a nice surface finish and color. A future where we can manufacture objects at home and throw them onto our compost heap after giving them some good use sounds pretty bright to me! A friendlier future for 3D printing? This print can naturally biodegrade About the Author Michael Ang is a Berlin-based artist / engineer working at the intersection of technology and human experience. He is the creator of the Polygon Construction Kit, a toolkit for creating large physical polygons using small 3D-printed connectors. His Light Catchers project collects crowdsourced light recordings into a public light sculpture.
Read more
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4244

article-image-freecad-open-source-design-bleeding-edge
Michael Ang
31 Dec 2014
5 min read
Save for later

FreeCAD: Open Source Design on the Bleeding Edge

Michael Ang
31 Dec 2014
5 min read
Are you looking for software for designing physical objects for 3D printing or physical construction? Computer-aided design (CAD) software is used extensively in engineering when designing objects that will be physically constructed. Programs such as Blender or SketchUp can be used to design models for 3D printing but there’s a catch: it’s quite possible to design models that look great onscreen but don’t meet the "solid object" requirements of 3D printing. Since CAD programs are targeted at building real-world objects, they can be a better fit for designing things that will exist not just on the screen but in the physical world. D-printable Servo controlled Silly-String Trigger by sliptonic FreeCAD distinguishes itself by being open source, cross-platform, and designed for parametric modeling. Anyone is free to download or modify FreeCAD, and it works on Windows, Mac, and Linux. With parametric modeling, it’s possible to go back and change parameters in your design and have the rest of your design update. For example, if you design a project box to hold your electronics project and decide it needs to be wider, you could change the width parameter and the box would automatically update. FreeCAD allows you to design using its visual interface and also offers complete control via Python scripting. Changing the size of a hole by changing a parameter I recommend Bram De Vries’ FreeCAD tutorials on YouTube to help you get started with FreeCAD. The FreeCAD website has links to download the software and a getting started guide. FreeCAD is under heavy development (by a small group of individuals) so expect to encounter a little strangeness from time to time, and save often! If you’re used to using software developed by a large and well-compensated engineering team you may be surprised that certain features are missing, but on the other hand it’s really quite amazing how much FreeCAD offers in software that is truly free. You might find a few gaping holes in functionality, but you also won’t find any features that are locked out until you go "Premium". If you didn’t think I was geeky enough for loving FreeCAD, let me tell you my favorite feature: everything is scriptable using Python. FreeCAD is primarily written in Python and you have access to a live Python console while the program is running (View->Views->Python console) that you can use to interactively write code and immediately see the results. Scripting in FreeCAD isn’t through some limited programming interface, or with a limited programming language: you have access to pretty much everything inside FreeCAD using standard Python code. You can script repetitive tasks in the UI, generate new parts from scratch, or even add whole new "workbenches" that appear alongside the built-in features in the FreeCAD UI. Creating a simple part interactively with Python There are many example macros to try. One of my favorites allows you to generate an airfoil shape from online airfoil profiles. My own Polygon Construction Kit (Polycon) is built inside FreeCAD. The basic idea of Polycon is to convert a simple polygon model into a physical object by creating a set of 3D-printed connectors that can be used to reconstruct the polygon in the real world. The process involves iterating over the 3D model and generating a connector for each vertex of the polygon. Then each connector needs to be exported as an STL file for the 3D printing software. By implementing Polycon as a FreeCAD module I was able to leverage a huge amount of functionality related to loading the 3D model, generating the connector shapes, and exporting the files for printing. FreeCAD’s UI makes it easy to see how the connectors look and make adjustments to each one as necessary. Then I can export all the connectors as well-organized STL files, all by pressing one button! Doing this manually instead of in code could literally take hundreds of hours, even for a simple model. FreeCAD is developed by a small group of people and is still in the "alpha" stage, but it has the potential to become a very important tool in the open source ecosystem. FreeCAD fills the need for an open source CAD tool the same way that Blender and GIMP do for 3D graphics and image editing. Another open source CAD tool to check out is OpenSCAD. This tool lets you design solid 3D objects (the kind we like to print!) using a simple programming language. OpenSCAD is a great program–its simple syntax and interface is a great way to start designing solid objects using code and thinking in "X-Y-Z". My first implementation of Polycon used OpenSCAD, but I eventually switched over to FreeCAD since it offers the ability to analyze shapes as well as create them, and Python is much more powerful than OpenSCAD’s programming language. If you’re building 3D models to be printed or are just interested in trying out computer-aided design, FreeCAD is worth a look. Commercial offerings are likely going to be more polished and reliable, but FreeCAD’s parametric modeling, scriptability, and cross-platform support in an open source package are quite impressive. It’s a great tool for designing objects to be built in the real world. About the Author Michael Ang is a Berlin-based artist and engineer working at the intersection of art, engineering, and the natural world. His latest project is the Polygon Construction Kit, a toolkit used to bridge the virtual and physical realms by constructing real-world objects from simple 3D models. He is one of the organizers of Art Hack Day, an event for hackers whose medium is tech and artists whose medium is technology.
Read more
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5036

article-image-what-i-learned-6-months-open-source-3d-printer
Michael Ang
26 Sep 2014
7 min read
Save for later

What 6 Months with an Open Source 3D Printer Taught Me

Michael Ang
26 Sep 2014
7 min read
3D printing is certainly a hot topic today, and having your own printer at home is becoming increasingly popular. There are a lot of options to choose from, and in this post I'll talk about why I chose to go with an open source 3D printer instead of a proprietary pre-built one, and what my experience with the printer has been. By sharing my 6 months of experience I hope to help you decide which kind of printer is best for you. My Prusa i3 Berlin 3D printer after 6 months Back in 2006 I had the chance to work with a 3D printer when the thought of having a 3D printer at home was mostly a fantasy. The printer in question was made by Stratasys, at the Eyebeam Art+Tech center in New York City. That printer cost upwards of $30,000—not exactly something to have at your house! The idea of doing something wrong with the printer and having to call a technician in to fix it was also a little intimidating. (My website has some of my early experiments with 3D printing.) Flash forward to today and there are literally dozens (or probably hundreds) of 3D printer designs available on the market. The designs range from high-end printers that can print plastic with embedded carbon fiber, to popular designs from MakerBot and DIY kits on eBay. One of the first low-cost 3D printers was the RepRap. The goal of the RepRap project is to create a self-replicating machine, where the parts for the machine can be fabricated by the machine itself. In practice this means that many of the parts of a RepRap-style 3D printer are actually printed on a RepRap printer. Most people who build RepRap printers start with a kit and then assemble the printer themselves. If the idea of a self-replicating machine sounds interesting, then RepRap may be for you. RepRap is now more of a philosophy and community than any specific printer. Once you assemble your printer you can make changes and upgrades to the machine by printing yourself new parts. There are certainly some challenges to building your own printer, though, so let's look at some of the advantages and disadvantages of going with an open source printer (building from a kit) versus a pre-packaged printer. Advantages of a pre-assembled commercial printer: Should print right out of the box Less tinkering needed to get good prints Each printer of a particular model is the same, making it easier to get support Advantages of an open source (RepRap-style) kit: Typically cheaper than pre-built Learn more about how the printer works Easier to make changes to the machine, and complete plans are available Easier to experiment with, for example different printing materials Disadvantages to pre-assembled: Making changes may void your warranty Typically more expensive May be locked into specific software or filament Disadvantages of open source: Can take a lot of work to get good prints Potentially lots of decisions to make, not pre-packaged May spend as much time on the machine as actually printing Technical differences aside, the idea of being part of an open source community based on the freedom to share knowledge and designs was really appealing. With that in mind I had a look at different open source 3D printer designs and capabilities. Since the RepRap designs are open source, anyone can modify them and create a "new" printer. In the end I settled on a variation of the Prusa i3 RepRap printer that is designed in Berlin, where I live. The process of getting a RepRap printer working can be challenging, because there's so much to learn at first. The Prusa i3 Berlin can be ordered as a kit with everything needed to build the printer, and with a workshop where you build the printer with the machine's designers over the course of a weekend. Two days to build a working 3D printer from a pile of parts? Yes, it can be done! Most of the parts in the printer kit Building the printer at the workshop saved an incredible amount of time. Questions like "does this look tight enough?" and "how does this part fit in here?" were answered on the spot. There are very active forums for RepRap printers with lots of people willing to help diagnose problems. But a few questions with even a one day turnaround time quickly adds up. By the end of the two days my printer was fully assembled and actually printed out a little plastic robot! This was pretty satisfying knowing that the printer had started the weekend as a bundle of parts. Quite a lot of wires Assembling the plastic extruders Thus began my 6-month (so far) adventure in 3D printing. It has been an awesome and at times frustrating journey. I mainly bought my printer to create connectors for my Polygon Construction Kit (Polycon). I'm printing connectors that assemble with some rods to make structures much larger than could be printed in one piece. My printer has been working well for that, but the main issue has been reliability and need for continual tweaking. Instead of just "hitting print" there is a constant struggle to keep everything lined up and printing smoothly. Printing on my RepRap is a lot more like baking a soufflé than ordering a burger. Completed printer in my studio Some highlights of the journey so far: Printing out parts strong enough to assemble some of my Polycon sculptures and show them at an art show in Berlin Designing my own accessories for the printer and having them downloaded more than 1,000 times on Thingiverse (not bad for some rather specialized tools) Printing upgrades for the printer, based on the continually updated source files Being able to get replacement parts at the hardware store, when one of the long threaded rods in the printer wore out Sculpture with 3D printed connectors. Image courtesy of Lehrter Siebzehn. And the lowlights: Never quite knowing if a print is going to complete successfully (though this can be a problem with many printers) Having enough trouble getting my first extruder working reliably for long prints that I haven't had time to get dual-extrusion prints working Accessory I designed for calibrating the printer, which I then shared with others As time goes on and I keep working on the printer, it's slowly getting more reliable, and I'm able to do more complicated prints without constant intervention. The learning process has been valuable too - I'm now able to look at basically every part of the machine and understand exactly what it's supposed to do. Once you really understand how a 3D printer works, you start to wonder what kind of upgrades are possible, or what other kinds of machine you could design. Printed upgrade parts A pre-packaged printer makes a lot of sense if you're mostly interested in printing things. The learning process for building your own printer can either be interesting or a frustrating obstacle, depending on your point of view. When you look at a print from your RepRap printer, it's incredible to consider that it is all built off the contributions and sharing of knowledge of a large community. If you're not just interested in making things, but making things that make things, then a RepRap printer might be for you! Upgraded printer with polygon sculpture About the author: Michael Ang is a Berlin-based artist and engineer working at the intersection of art, engineering, and the natural world. His latest project is the Polygon Construction Kit, a toolkit for bridging the virtual and physical worlds by translating simple 3D models into physical structures.
Read more
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4494

article-image-makers-journey-3d-printing
Travis Ripley
30 Jun 2014
14 min read
Save for later

A Maker's Journey into 3D printing

Travis Ripley
30 Jun 2014
14 min read
If you’ve visited any social media outlets, you’ve probably come across a never-ending list of new words and terms—the Internet of Things, technological dissonance, STEM, open source, tinkerer, maker culture, constructivism, DIY, fabrication, rapid-prototyping, techshop, makerspace, 3D printers, Raspberry Pi, wearables, and more. These terms are typically used to describe a Maker, or they have something to do with Maker culture. Follow along to learn about my particular journey into the Maker culture, specifically in the 3D printing space. The rise of the maker culture Maker culture is on the rise. This is a culture that thrives at the intersection of technology and innovation at the informal, social, and peer-led level. The interactions of skilled people driven to share their knowledge with others, develop new pathways, and create solutions for current problems have built a new community. I am proud to say that I am a Maker-Tinkerer (or that I have some form of motivated ADHD that drives me to engage in engineering-oriented pursuits). My journey started at ground zero while studying 3D design and development. A maker's journey I knew there was more that I could do with my knowledge of rendering the three-dimensional surface of an object. Early on, however, I only thought about extending my knowledge for entertainment purposes, such as video games. I didn’t understand the power of having this knowledge and the way it could help create real-world solutions. Then, I came across an issue of Make Magazine and it changed my mental state overnight—I had to create tangible things. Now that I had the information to send me in the right direction, I needed an outlet. An industry friend mentioned a local Hackerspace, known as Deezmaker, which was holding informational workshops about 3D printing. So, I signed up for an introductory class. I had no clue what I was getting myself into as I crossed that first threshold, but by that evening, I was versed in topics that I thought were far from my mental capabilities. I was hooked. The workshop consisted of part lecture, and part hands-on material. I learned that you couldn't just start using a 3D printer. You actually need to have some basic understanding of the manufacturing process, like understanding that layers of material need to be successfully laid down in order to move on to the next stage in the process. Being the curious, impatient, and overly enthusiastic man-child that I am, this was the most difficult part for me, as I couldn’t wait to engage in this new world. 3D printing Almost two years later, I am fully immersed in the world of 3D printing. I currently have a 3D printer at home (which is almost obsolete, by today’s standards) and I have access to multiple printers at a local techshop/makerspace known as Makerplace here in San Diego, Ca. I use this technology regularly, since I have changed directions in my career as a 3D artist towards Manufacturing Engineering and Rapid Prototyping. I am currently attending a Machine Technology/Engineering program at San Diego City College; (for more info on the best Machining program in the country visit http://www.JCbollinger.com). The benefit for me using 3D printers is rapidly producing iterations of prototypes for my clientele, since most people feel more reassured in the process if they have tangible and solid objects and are more likely to trust you as a designer. I feel that having access to this also helps me complete more jobs successfully given that turnaround times for updates can be as little as a few hours, rather than days or weeks (depending on the size/scale). Currently I have a few reoccurring clients that want updates often, and by showing them my progress, the iterations are fewer and I can move onto the next project with no hesitation given how we can successfully see design updates rapidly and minimize the flaws and failures. I produce prototypes for all industries: toys, robotics, vehicles, and so on. Think of it as producing solutions, and how you can either make something better or simpler. Entertaining the idea of a challenge and solving these challenges has benefits as with each new design job you have all these tangible objects to look at and examine. As a hobbyist, the technology has made it easy to produce new or even obsolete items. For example, I love Transformers, but you know how plastic does two things very well: it breaks and gets lost. I came across a forum where guys were distributing the programs for the arm extrusions that break (no one likes gluing), so I printed the parts that had been missing for decades, rebuilt the armature that had for so long been displaced, and then like magic I felt like I was six years old again with a perfectly working Transformer. Here are a few things that I've learned along the way: 3D printing is also known as Additive Manufacturing. It is the process of producing three-dimensional objects in which successive layers of varied material are extruded under computer-controlled equipment that is fed information from 3D models. These models are derived from a data source that processes the information into machine language. The plastic extrusion technology that is now becoming slowly more popular is known as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). This process was developed in the early 1990s for the application of job production, mass production, rapid prototyping, product development, and distributed manufacturing. The principle of FDM is that material is laid down in layers. There are many other processes such as Selective Heat Sintering (SHS), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Stereolithography (SLA), and Plaster-Based 3D Printing (PP) to name a few. We will keep it simple here and go over the FDM process for now, as most of the printers at the hobbyist level use this process. The FDM process significantly affected roles within the production and manufacturing industries, as wearing multiple hats as an engineer, designer, and operator and as growth made the technology more affordable to an array of industrial fields. In contrast, CNC Machining, which is a Subtractive Manufacturing process, has been incorporated naturally to work together in this development. The influence of this technology in the industrial and manufacturing industries created exposure to new methods of production at exponential rates, for example Automation. For the home-use and hobbyist market, the 3D printers produced by the open source/open hardware initiative can be stemmed directly or indirectly from the RepRap.org project, which is a free to low-cost desktop 3D printer that is self-replicating. That being said, you can thank them for starting this revolution. By getting involved in this community you are benefiting everyone by spreading the spark that will continue to create new developments in manufacturing and consumer technology. The FDM process can be done with a multitude of materials; the two most popular options at this time are PLA (Polylactic acid) and ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene). Both PLA and ABS have pros and cons, depending upon your model structure. The future use of the print and client requests and understanding the fundamental differences between the two can help you determine your choice of one over the other, or in case of owning a printer with two extruders, how they can be combined. In some cases, PVA (Polyvinyl Acetate) is also used as support material (in the case of two extruders) unlike PLA or ABS, which if used as support material will require cleanup when finishing a print. PVA is water soluble, so you can soak your print in warm water and the support structures will dissolve away. PLA (Polylactic Acid) is a strong biodegradable plastic that is derived from renewable resources: cornstarch and sugarcane. It is more resistant to UV rays than ABS (so you will not see fading with your prints). Also, it sticks better than any other material to the surface of your hotplate (minimal warping), which is a huge advantage. It prints at -180* C, and it can create an ooze, and if your nozzle is loaded it will drip, which also means that leaving a print in your car on a hot day may cause damage. ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) is stronger than PLA, but is non-biodegradable; it is a synthetic monomer produced from propylene and ammonia. This means it has more rigidity than PLA, but is also more flexible. It is a colorfast material (which means it will hold its color for years). It prints at -220*C, and is amorphous and therefore has no true melting point, so a heated bed is needed as warping can and will occur (usually because the bed is not hot enough—at least 80*C —or the Z axis is not calibrated correctly). Printer options For the hobbyist maker, there are a few 3D printer options to consider. Depending upon your skill level, your needs, budget and commitments, there is a printer out there for you. The least expensive, smallest, and most straightforward printer available on the market is Printrbot Simple Maker’s 3D Printer. Retailing at $349.99, this printer comes in a kit that includes the bare necessities you need to get started. It is capable of printing a 4” cube. You can also purchase it already assembled for a little extra. The kit and PLA filament are available at www.makershed.com. The 3D printer I started on, personally own, and recommend is the Afina H480 3D printer. Retailing at $1299.99, this printer provides the easiest setup right out of the box, it’s fully assembled, comes with a heated platform for the aid of adhesion and for less chance of warping, and can print up to a 5” cube. It also comes loaded with its own native 3D software, where you can manipulate your .STL files. It has an automated utility to calibrate the printer’s build platform with the printhead, and also automatically generates any support setup material and the “raft”, which is the base support for your prints. There is so much more to it, but as I said I recommend this for beginners, and it is also available through www.makershed.com. For the person who wants to print, and is at the hobbyist and semi-professional level, consider the next generation in 3D printing, the MAKERBOT Replicator. It is quick and efficient. Retailing at $2899.00, this machine has an extremely high layer resolution, LCD display, and if you run out of filament (ABS/PLA), there is no need to start over; this machine will alert you via computer or smartphone that a replacement is needed. There are many types of 3D printers available, with options including open source, open hardware, filament types, delta style mechanics, single/double extruders, and the list goes on. My main suggestion is to try before you buy, either at a local hackerspace or a local Makerfaire. It’s a worthwhile investment that pays for itself. Choosing your tools Before you begin, it's also important to choose your design tools. There are many great open source tools to choose from. Here are some of my favorites. When it comes to design tools, there is a multitude of cost effective and free tools out there to get you started. First off, the 3D printing process has a required “tool-chain” that must be followed in order to complete the process, roughly broken down into three parts: CAD (Computer Aided Design): Tools used to design 3D parts for printing. There are very few interchangeable CAD file formats that are sometimes referred to as parametric files. The most widely used interchangeable mesh file format is .STL (Stereolithography). This format is the most important as it used by CAM tools. CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing): Tools handling the intermediate step of translating CAD files into a machine-friendly format. Firmware for electronics: This is what runs the onboard electronics of the printer, and is the closest to actual programming; a process known as cross compiling. Here are my best picks for each category, known as FLOSS (free/libre/open source software). FLOSS CAD tools, for example OpenSCAD, FreeCAD, and HeeksCAD for the most part create these parametric files that usually represent parts or assemblies in terms of CSG (Constructive Solid Geometry) which basically represent a tree of Boolean operations performed on primitive shapes such as cubes, spheres, cylinders, and pyramids. These are modified numerically and with great precision and the geometry is a mathematical representation of such, no matter how much you zoom in or out. Another category of CAD tool that represents the parts as 3D polygon mesh is for the most part used for special effects in movies or video games (CG). They are also a little more user friendly, and examples would be Autodesk Maya and Autodesk 3ds Max (these choices are subscription/retail-based). But there are also open source and free versions of this tool such as Autodesk 123D, Google Sketchup, and Blender; I suggest the latter options, since they are free, user friendly, and they are much easier to learn since their options are narrowed down strictly to producing 3D meshes. If you need more precision you should look at OpenSCAD (my favorite), as it was created directly for making physical objects rather than game design or animation. OpenSCAD is easy to learn, with a simple interface, it is powerful and cross-platform, and there are many examples you can use along with strong community support. Next, you’ll need to convert your 3D masterpiece (.stl) into a machine friendly format known as G-Code. This process is also known as “slicing”. You’re going to need some CAM software to produce the “tool paths,” which is the next stop in the tool chain. Most of the slicing software available is open source. Some examples are Slic3r (the most popular, with an ease of use recommended for beginners), Skeinforge (dated, but still one of the best), Cura, and MatterSlice. There is also great closed source slicing software out there. One in particular is KISSlicer, which is a pro version that supports multi-extruder printing. The next stop after slicing is using software known as: A G-Code interpreter, which breaks down each line of the code into electronic signals. A G-Code sender, which sends the signals to the motors on the printer to tell them how to move. This software is usually directly linked to an EMC (Electronic Machine Controller), which controls the printer directly. It can also be linked to an integrated hardware interface that has a G-Code interpreter built in, which loads the G-Code directly from a memory card (SD card/USB). The last stop is the firmware, which controls the electronics onboard the printer. For the most part, the CPUs that control these machines are simple microcontrollers that are usually Arduino-based, and they are compiled using the Arduino IDE. This process may sound time consuming, but once you go through the tool chain process a few times, it becomes second nature, just like driving a manual transmission in a car. Where to go from here? When I finished my first hackerspace workshop, I had been assimilated into a culture that I was not only benefiting from personally, but a culture that I could share my knowledge with and contribute to. I have received far more in my journey as a maker than any previous endeavor. To anyone who is curious, and mechanically inclined (or not), who believes they have an answer to a solution, I challenge you. I challenge you to make the leap into this culture—join a hackerspace, attend a makerfaire, and enrich your life and the lives of others. About the Author Travis Ripley is a designer/developer. He enjoys developing products with composites, woods, steel, and aluminum, and has been immersed in the Maker community for over two years. He also teaches game development at the University of California, Los Angeles. He can be found @travezripley.
Read more
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3384
Unlock access to the largest independent learning library in Tech for FREE!
Get unlimited access to 7500+ expert-authored eBooks and video courses covering every tech area you can think of.
Renews at $19.99/month. Cancel anytime