Tech News - Malware Analysis

git-bug is a distributed bug tracker that is embedded in git. Using git's internal storage ensures that no files are added in your project. You can push your bugs to the same git remote that you are already using to collaborate with other people. The main idea behind implementing a distributed bug tracker in Git was to stop relying on a web service somewhere to deal with bugs. Browsing and editing bug reports offline wouldn’t be much of a pain, thanks to this implementation. While git-bug addresses a pressing need, note that the project is not yet available for full fledged use and is currently a proof of concept released just 3 days ago at version 0.2.0. Reddit is abuzz with views on the release. A user quotes- Source: reddit.com Certain users also had counter thoughts on the cons of the release - Source: reddit.com   Now that you want to get your hands on git-bug, let’s look at how to get started. Installing git-bug, Linux packages needed and CLI usage for its implementation To install the git-bug, all you need to do is execute the following command- go get github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug If it's not done already, add golang binary directory in your PATH: export PATH=$PATH:$GOROOT/bin:$GOPATH/bin You can set pre-compiled binaries by following 3 simple steps: Head over to the release page and download the appropriate binary for your system. Copy the binary anywhere in your PATH Rename the binary to git-bug (or git-bug.exe on windows) The only linux packge needed for this release is the Archlinux (AUR) Further, you can use the CLI to implement the git-bug using the following commands- Create a new bug: git bug new Your favorite editor will open to write a title and a message. You can push your new entry to a remote: git bug push [<remote>] And pull for updates: git bug pull [<remote>] List existing bugs: git bug ls   Use commands like show, comment, open or close to display and modify bugs. For more details about each command, you can run git bug <command> --help or scan the command's documentation. Features of the git-bug #1 Interactive User Interface for the terminal Use the git bug termui  command to browse and edit bugs. This short video will demonstrate how easy and interactive it is to browse and edit bugs #2 Launch a rich Web UI Take a look at the awesome web UI that is obtained with git bug webui. Source: github.com     Source: github.com   This web UI is entirely packed inside the same go binary and serve static content through a localhost http server. It connects to  backend through a GraphQL API. Take a look at the schema for more clarity. The additional features that are planned include media embedding import/export of github issue extendable data model to support arbitrary bug tracker inflatable raptor Every new release is expected to come with exciting new features, it is also coupled with a few minor constraints. You can check out some of the minor inconveniences as listed out on the github page. We can’t wait for the release to be in a fully working condition. But before that, if you need any additional information on how the git-bug works, head over to the github page. Snapchat source code leaked and posted to GitHub GitHub open sources its GitHub Load Balancer (GLB) Director Homebrew’s Github repo got hacked in 30 mins. How can open source projects fight supply chain attacks?

Researchers from the North China Electric Power University have recently published a paper titled, ‘A Review on The Use of Deep Learning in Android Malware Detection’. Researchers highlight the fact that Android applications can not only be used by application developers, but also by malware developers with criminal intention to design and spread malicious applications that can affect the normal work of Android phones and tablets, steal personal information and credential data, or even worse lock the phone and ask for ransom. In this paper, they have explained how deep learning methods can be used as a countermeasure in Android malware detection to fight back malware. Android Malware Detection Techniques Researchers have said that one critical point of mobile phones is that they are a sensor-based event system, which permits malware to respond to approaching SMS, position changes and so forth, increasing the sophistication of automated malware-analysis techniques. Moreover, the apps can use services and activities and integrate varied programming languages (e.g. Java and C++) in one application. Each application is analyzed in the following stages: Static Analysis The static analysis screens parts of the application without really executing them. This analysis incorporates Signature-based, Permission-based and Component-based analysis. The Signature-based strategy draws features and makes distinctive signs to identify specific malware. Hence, it falls short to recognize the variation or unidentified malware. The Permission-based strategy recognizes permission requests to distinguish malware. The Component-based techniques decompile the APP to draw and inspect the definition and byte code connections of significant components (i.e. activities, services, etc.), to identify the exposures. The principal drawbacks of static analysis are the lack of real execution paths and suitable execution conditions. Dynamic Analysis This technique includes the execution of the application on either a virtual machine or a physical device. This analysis results in a less abstract perspective of application than static analysis. The code paths executed during runtime are a subset of every single accessible path. The principal objective of the analysis is to achieve high code inclusion since every feasible event ought to be activated to watch any possible malicious behavior Hybrid Analysis The hybrid analysis technique includes consolidating static and dynamic features gathered from examining the application and drawing data while the application is running, separately. Nevertheless, it would boost the accuracy of the identification. The principal drawback of hybrid analysis is that it consumes the Android system resources and takes a long time to perform the analysis. Use of deep learning in Android malware detection Currently available machine learning has several weaknesses and some open issues related to the use of DL in Android malware detection include: Deep learning lacks transparency to provide an interpretation of the decision created by its methods. Malware analysts need to understand how the decision was made. There is no assurance that classification models built based on deep learning will perform in different conditions with new data that would not match previous training data. Deep learning studies complex correlations within input and output feature with no innate depiction of causality. Deep learning models are not autonomous and need continual retraining and rigorous parameters adjustments. The DL models in the training phase were subjected to data poisoning attacks, which are merely implemented by manipulating the training and instilling data that make a deep learning model to commit errors. In the testing phase, the models were exposed to several attack types including: Adversarial Attacks are where the DL model inputs are the ones that an adversary has invented deliberately to cause the model to make mistakes Evasion attack: Here, the intruder exploits malevolent instances at test time to have them incorrectly classified as benign by a trained classifier, without having an impact over the training data. This can breach system integrity, either with a targeted or with an indiscriminate attack. Impersonate attack: This attack mimics data instances from targets. The attacker plans to create particular adversarial instances to such an extent that current deep learning-based models mistakenly characterize original instances with different tags from the imitated ones. Inversion attack: This attack uses the APIs allowed by machine learning systems to assemble some fundamental data with respect to the target system models. This kind of attack is divided into two types; Whitebox attack and Blackbox attack. The white-box attack implies that an aggressor can loosely get to and download learning models and other supporting data, while the black-box one points to the way that the aggressor just knows the APIs opened by learning models and some observation after providing input. According to the researchers, hardening deep learning models against different adversarial attacks and detecting, describing and measuring concept drift are vital in future work in Android malware detection. They also mentioned that the limitation of deep learning methods such as lack of transparency and being nonautonomous, is to build more efficient models. To know more about this research in detail, read the research paper. Researchers introduce a deep learning method that converts mono audio recordings into 3D sounds using video scenes IEEE Computer Society predicts top ten tech trends for 2019: assisted transportation, chatbots, and deep learning accelerators among others Stanford researchers introduce DeepSolar, a deep learning framework that mapped every solar panel in the US

Researchers from Skylight Cyber, an Australian cybersecurity enterprise, have tricked Blackberry Cylance’s AI-based antivirus product. They identified a peculiar bias of the antivirus product towards a specific game engine and bypassed it to trick the product into accepting malicious malware files. This discovery means companies working in the field of artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity need to rethink their approach to creating new products. The bypass is not just limited to Cylance, researchers chose it as it is a leading vendor in the field and is publicly available. The researchers Adi Ashkenazy and Shahar Zini from Skylight Cyber say they can reverse the model of any AI-based EPP (Endpoint Protection Platform) product, and find a bias enabling a universal bypass. Essentially meaning if you could truly understand how a certain model works, and the type of features it uses to reach a decision, you would have the potential to fool it consistently. How did the researchers trick Cylance into thinking bad is good? Cylance’s machine-learning algorithm has been trained to favor a benign file, causing it to ignore malicious code if it sees strings from the benign file attached to a malicious file. The researchers took advantage of this and appended strings from a non-malicious file to a malicious one, tricking the system into thinking the malicious file is safe and avoiding detection. The trick works even if the Cylance engine previously concluded the same file was malicious before the benign strings were appended to it. The Cylance engine keeps a scoring mechanism ranging from -1000 for the most malicious files, and +1000 for the most benign of files. It also whitelists certain families of executable files to avoid triggering false positives on legitimate software. The researchers suspected that the machine learning would be biased toward code in those whitelisted files. So, they extracted strings from an online gaming program that Cylance had whitelisted and appended it to malicious files. The Cylance engine tagged the files benign and shifted scores from high negative numbers to high positive ones. https://youtu.be/NE4kgGjhf1Y The researchers tested against the WannaCry ransomware, Samsam ransomware, the popular Mimikatz hacking tool, and hundreds of other known malicious files. This method proved successful for 100% of the top 10 Malware for May 2019, and close to 90% for a larger sample of 384 malware. “As far as I know, this is a world-first, proven global attack on the ML [machine learning] mechanism of a security company,” told Adi Ashkenazy, CEO of Skylight Cyber to Motherboard, who first reported the news. “After around four years of super hype [about AI], I think this is a humbling example of how the approach provides a new attack surface that was not possible with legacy [antivirus software].” Gregory Webb, chief executive officer of malware protection firm Bromium Inc., told SiliconAngle that the news raises doubts about the concept of categorizing code as “good” or “bad.” “This exposes the limitations of leaving machines to make decisions on what can and cannot be trusted,” Webb said. “Ultimately, AI is not a silver bullet.” Martijn Grooten, a security researcher also added his views to the Cylance Bypass story. He states, “This is why we have good reasons to be concerned about the use of AI/ML in anything involving humans because it can easily reinforce and amplify existing biases.” The Cylance team have now confirmed the global bypass issue and will release a hotfix in the next few days. “We are aware that a bypass has been publicly disclosed by security researchers. We have verified there is an issue which can be leveraged to bypass the anti-malware component of the product. Our research and development teams have identified a solution and will release a hotfix automatically to all customers running current versions in the next few days,” the team wrote in a blog post. You can go through the blog post by Skylight Cyber researchers for additional information. Microsoft releases security updates: a “wormable” threat similar to WannaCry ransomware discovered 25 million Android devices infected with ‘Agent Smith’, a new mobile malware FireEye reports infrastructure-crippling Triton malware linked to Russian government tech institute

A ransomware strain named Lilocked or Lilu has been affecting thousands of Linux-based servers all over the world since mid-July and the attacks got intensified by the end of August, ZDNet reports.  Lilocked ransomware’s first case got noticed when Micheal Gillespie, a malware researcher uploaded a ransomware note on the website, ID Ransomware. This website is used for identifying the name of ransomware from the ransomware note or from the demand specified in the attack. It is still unknown as to how the servers have been breached. https://twitter.com/demonslay335/status/1152593459225739265 According to a thread on a Russian-speaking forum, attackers might be targeting those systems that are running outdated Exim (email) software. The forum also mentions that the ransomware managed to get root access to servers by “unknown means”. Read Also: Exim patches a major security bug found in all versions that left millions of Exim servers vulnerable to security attacks Lilocked doesn't encrypt system files, but it encrypts a small subset of file extensions, such as JS, CSS, HTML, SHTML, PHP, INI, and other image file formats so the infected servers are running normally. As per the French security researcher, Benkow, Lilocked has encrypted more than 6,700 servers, out of which many have been indexed and cached in Google search results. However, the number of affected servers is much higher. “Not all Linux systems run web servers, and there are many other infected systems that haven't been indexed in Google search results,” ZDNet reports. It is easy to identify the servers that have been affected by the ransomware as most of their files are encrypted and they sport a new ".lilocked" file extension. Image Source: ZDNet Read Also: Exim patches a major security bug found in all versions that left millions of Exim servers vulnerable to security attacks The victims are first redirected to a portal on the dark web, where they are asked to enter a key from the ransom note and later are notified that their data has been encrypted. The victims are then asked to transfer 0.03 bitcoin, which is around $325. https://twitter.com/dulenkp/status/1170091139510218752 https://twitter.com/Zanket_com/status/1171089344460972032 To know more about the Lilocked ransomware in detail, head over to ZDNet. Other interesting news in security Intel’s DDIO and RDMA enabled microprocessors vulnerable to new NetCAT attack Endpoint protection, hardening, and containment strategies for ransomware attack protection: CISA recommended FireEye report Highlights StackRox App integrates into the Sumo Logic Dashboard  for improved Kubernetes security

Malware or a malicious software is designed to harm user’s computer systems in multiple ways. Over the years, hackers and attackers have implemented various methods to inject viruses, worms, Trojans, and spyware to collapse a computer system. To combat against the current age malware, you must know how a malware function and what techniques attackers use to launch a malware within a system. Some advanced malware techniques include: Privilege Escalation is how a malware attempts to increase its reach within the system. Persistence Methods keep malware in execution state for a longer time. Data Encoding basically explores ways to hide the intent of the malware. Covert launching techniques help in launching malware in the most stealthy manner. Out of the three, privilege escalation is a network intrusion method where malware can enter the system via programming errors or design flaws. With the help of these channels, the attacker can have a direct access to the network and its associated data and applications. Watch the video below by Munir Njenga to know all about privilege escalation and its types in depth using real world examples. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qzlkw5sJUsw About Munir Njengar Munir is a technology enthusiast, cybersecurity consultant, and researcher. His skills and competencies stem from his active involvement in engagements that deliver advisory services such as network security reviews, security course development, training and capacity building, mobile and internet banking security reviews (BSS, MSC, HLR/AUC, IN, NGN, GGSN/SGSN), web applications, and network attack and penetration testing. To know more about privilege Escalation and to learn other malware analysis methods, check out our course titled ‘Advanced Malware Analysis’ to which this video belongs.

Have you heard about the latest VPNFilter Malware attack? In brief, the software networking firm and its network analysis department known as ‘Talos’ identified a malware known as VPNFilter a few weeks ago. Something about these attacks made them particularly risky. If you are an individual or any small or medium business organization accessing the internet using routers from companies such as Linksys, Netgear, QNAP, TP-Link, ASUS, D-Link, Huawei, Ubiquiti, UPVEL, and ZTE then you are vulnerable to the VPNFilter malware attack. Read on to understand where do you stand and what you can do to avoid falling victim of this vicious malware attack. How VPNFilter malware works? The first thing that you need to understand is that VPNFilter has a 3 stage attack procedure. The first stage, which is one of the most potent and dangerous one too, plants itself into the router firmware. In most malware attack cases, a reboot would make the malware go away. That’s where VPNFilter stands out. It persists through the reboot and after the reboot it initiates the second stage. The second stage is about spying on the user activity and data and then storing and accessing user data, tracking the URLs and getting to know more about the victim. The most terrifying factor is that the user never realizes that they have been attacked. The reason being that VPNFilter uses the technique of “Man in the Middle” or MitT attack. What happens in this form of cyber attack is that the spyware gets attached to the router and then collects user data and prepares for a larger assault while the user is completely unaware of it. The image below explains the process.     Source: Yeahhub.com If this seems scary to you then you haven’t yet heard the interesting bit yet. The third stage is about introducing different plugins which can perform different types of actions. One of them is it can downgrade the security level of your requests from HTTPS to HTTP protocol. This in turn makes your data unencrypted and also makes your passwords and other valuable data open to anyone who is snooping on your network. The rest of the hacking process then eventually becomes much easier. Imagine what could happen if you logged in to a social media platform or into your netbanking application and the data is phished away. The worst part is that you won’t even know that your account is hacked until the hackers expose themselves by making malicious transactions. The horror story doesn’t end here, it also comes with a “Remote Destroy” button. This enables the hackers to delete important network and configuration files from your router before destroying the malware and this means your router will be rendered useless after they choose to do so. This gives them the power to disrupt internet connectivity on a global scale since the number of routers presently affected can be anywhere around 500k. Is there a way out? How can you save your router from this onslaught. Rebooting doesn’t work. The only way that some groups have suggested is to restore factory defaults of your router, upgrade the firmware of your router, and log in with your credentials. This three step process might be the only way you can get away from this attack. How to know that your router is no good? Try updating it to the latest version of firmware, if it says unable to upgrade, you can be damn sure of the fact that it’s time for you to buy a new one. BeyondCorp is transforming enterprise security Top 5 cybersecurity assessment tools for networking professionals IoT Forensics: Security in an always connected world where things talk

E-mail is the traditional, primary, and the most vital part of communication within business organizations. They hold minutes of important discussions, confidential documents as attachments, high-profile business contact details, and much more. Hence, hackers or intruders often use emails as a medium to deliver dangerous content to the victim via attachments or by providing links to malicious websites. Companies throughout the world take huge efforts to detect malicious content within their communication media by setting up robust antivirus firewalls. But, how secure are they? Many choose antivirus engines based on their popularity than its performance. The myth that famous antivirus packages get you utmost security is now debunked by Email-sec-360°. According to Phys Org, it surpasses 60 other popular antivirus packages known to us. Email-sec-360° is developed by Aviad Cohen, a Ph.D. student, and researcher at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU) Malware Lab researchers. It detects unknown, malicious emails much more accurately than the popular antivirus products such as Kaspersky, McAfee, Avast, etc. Email-sec-360° vs other popular antivirus engines Present antivirus engines use rule-based methods to analyze specific email sections. These often overlook the other important parts of the email. Dr. Nir Nissim, head of the David and Janet Polak Family Malware Lab at Cyber@BGU, stated that the existing antivirus engines use signature-based detection methods. These methods are at times insufficient for detecting new and unknown malicious emails. However, Email-sec-360° is based on machine learning methods and leverages 100 general descriptive features extracted from all email components, which include the header, body and attachments. Also an interesting fact about this method is that, it does not require an internet access. Thus, it provides a seamless threat detection in real-time and can be easily deployed by any individual or organizations. A well-experimented approach by the Malware Lab The researchers used a collection of 33,142 emails, which included 12,835 malicious and 20,307 benign emails obtained between 2013 and 2016. Later, they compared their detection model to 60 industry-leading antivirus engines as well as previous research. On doing this, they found their system to outperform the next best antivirus engine, Cyren, by a 13 percent range. BGU’s Malware Lab method vs the others BGU Malware Lab plan to extend this method by including research and analysis of attachments (PDFs and Microsoft Office documents) within the Email-sec-360°. Dr. Nissim adds,”since these are often used by hackers to get users to open and propagate viruses and malware.” They are also planning to develop an online system that evaluates the security risk posed by an email message. This system will be based on advanced machine learning methods and would also allow users to submit suspicious email messages and quickly obtain a maliciousness score. The system will further recommend on how to treat the email and would help to collect benign and malicious emails for research purposes. Read more about Email-sec-360° in the Phys Org blog post Pentest tool in focus: Metasploit 12 common malware types you should know 4 Ways You Can Use Machine Learning for Enterprise Security

Yesterday, Mingye Wang reported a bug in the Glibc, GNU C Library. According to him, the dl_platform detection performs "cripple AMD" in the sysdeps in Glibc. The dl_platform check is used for dispatching SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) libraries. Explaining the bug in detail, Wang writes, that in 2017, Glibc got the capability to transparently load libraries for specific CPU families with some SIMD extensions combinations to benefit the x86 users. However, this implementation limits two "good" sets of modern SIMD instructions to only Intel processors that prevent competitor CPUs with equivalent capabilities to fully perform, something that should not work in any free software package.  He further added that this bug seemed like an implementation of Intel’s ‘cripple AMD’ bug which was reported in 2009, and hence the name. According to the author, Agner Fog, “software compiled with the Intel compiler or the Intel function libraries has inferior performance on AMD and VIA processors. The Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string says "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version.” A user commented on HackerNews, “Hm, is this really "crippling" AMD? Seems more like Intel submitted a performance patch that is only enabled for Intel processors, but could be extended to support AMD too. There's a moral difference. It is wrong to intentionally degrade the performance of your competitors. It is not wrong to not do something that benefits others.” Mingye Wang writes, “The crux of the problem lies in the `(cpu_features->kind == arch_kind_intel)` (LHS now renamed cpu_features->basic.kind) comparison that surrounds the entire x86_64 case. Although AMD has not yet made any processors with AVX512, their newer processors (Zen -- Epyc, Ryzen) should at least satisfy the haswell test case.” According to Wang, glibc should remove the dl platform check and the processors should use their feature flags. At 07:15:15 UTC, the page updated that the bug has been resolved and it is a duplicate of 2018, bug 23249, where Epyc and other current AMD CPUs couldn’t select the "haswell" platform subdirectory. This bug was reported by Allan Jensen, who wrote, “Recently a "haswell" sub-arch was introduced to be similar to the old i686 subarch for x86. It is documented as requiring BMI1, BMI2, LZCNT, MOVBE, POPCNT, AVX2 and FMA, but undocumented also checks the CPU is an Intel CPU before using the faster paths. I would suggest glibc fixes that before it becomes public knowledge.” Florian Weimer, author at Red Hat, writes, “We really need feedback from AMD for this change, and it has been difficult for us to talk to engineers there. If you have contacts there, please encourage them to reach out to Red Hat Engineer Partner Management via their own channels (or contact me directly). I agree that this situation is unfortunate, and that AMD customers may not get the best possible performance as the result.” Weimer further added, “The "haswell" platform subdirectory is somewhat ill-defined, see bug 24080. I don't think current AMD CPUs implement the ERMS feature, which Intel assumes is part of the "haswell" definition. This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23249.” Few users are sceptical about this news and think that there might be a planned conspiracy behind this bug. A user commented on HackerNews, “Could this be a legitimate unintended consequence of the pull request or some new dirty pool tactic? Either way I agree with Mingye Wang's assessment, this kind of thing cannot be allowed to get into the source tree. Hopefully AMD will increase their Linux activities with their new bigger market share and income.” To know more about this news, check out the post by Sourceware Bugzilla. Other interesting news in Security  CircleCI reports of a security breach and malicious database in a third-party vendor account Hundreds of millions of Facebook users’ phone numbers found online, thanks to an exposed server, TechCrunch reports Espressif IoT devices susceptible to WiFi vulnerabilities can allow hijackers to crash devices connected to enterprise networks  

Security Researchers have discovered a new backdoor trojan, dubbed as ‘SpeakUp’ which exploits known vulnerabilities in six different Linux distributions and has the ability to infect MacOS. This trojan discovered by Check Point Research, is being utilised in a crypto mining campaign that has targeted more than 70,000 servers worldwide so far. Attackers have been using SpeakUp in a campaign to deploy Monero cryptocurrency miners on infected servers thus earning around 107 Monero coins (around $4,500). Last month, the backdoor was spotted for the first time and researchers discovered a built-in Python script that allowed the trojan to spread through the local network, laterally. The virus remains undetected, has complex propagation tactics, and the threat surface contains servers that run the top sites on the internet. What can this trojan do? Vulnerable systems that have been affected by this trojan allow the hackers to perform a host of  illicit activities like modification of the local cron utility to gain boot persistence, take control over shell commands, execute files downloaded from a remote command and control (C&C) server, and update or uninstall itself. According to the researchers, SpeakUp has already been spotted exploiting the Linux servers that run more than 90 percent of the top 1 million domains in the U.S. The hackers behind SpeakUp are using an exploit for the ThinkPHP framework to infect servers and the researchers have not  seen the attackers targeting anything except ThinkPHP. The trojan has been crafted with complexity and can scan local networks for open ports, use a list of pre-defined usernames and passwords to brute-force nearby systems and take over unpatched systems using one of these seven exploits: CVE-2012-0874: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Multiple Security Bypass Vulnerabilities CVE-2010-1871: JBoss Seam Framework remote code execution JBoss AS 3/4/5/6: Remote Command Execution CVE-2017-10271: Oracle WebLogic wls-wsat Component Deserialization RCE CVE-2018-2894: Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware. Hadoop YARN ResourceManager - Command Execution CVE-2016-3088: Apache ActiveMQ Fileserver File Upload Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Security researchers have also pointed out to the fact that the SpeakUp’s authors have the ability to download any code they want to the servers. “SpeakUp’s obfuscated payloads and propagation technique is beyond any doubt the work of a bigger threat in the making. It is hard to imagine anyone would build such a compound array of payloads just to deploy few miners. The threat actor behind this campaign can at any given time deploy additional payloads, potentially more intrusive and offensive. It has the ability to scan the surrounding network of an infected server and distribute the malware.” According to Threatpost, Oded Vanunu, head of products vulnerability research for Check Point, said that “the scope of this attack includes all servers running ThinkPHP, Hadoop Yarn, Oracle WebLogic, Apache ActiveMQ and Red Hat JBoss. Since these software can be deployed on virtual servers, all cloud infrastructure are also prone to be affected.” According to the analysis by Check Point Research, the malware is currently distributed to Linux servers mainly located in China. Lotem Finkelstein, one of the Check Point researchers told ZDNet that “the infections in non-Chinese countries comes from SpeakUp using its second-stage exploits to infect companies' internal networks, which resulted in the trojan spreading outside the normal geographical area of a Chinese-only PHP framework.” You can head over to Check Point Research official post for a break down of how this trojan works as well as an analysis of its impact. Git-bug: A new distributed bug tracker embedded in git Fortnite just fixed a bug that let attackers to fully access user accounts, impersonate real players and buy V-Buck 35-year-old vulnerabilities in SCP client discovered by F-Secure researcher

This week, an IoT worm called Silex that targets a Unix-like system took down around 2,000 devices, ZDNet reports. This malware attacks by attempting a login with default credentials and after gaining access. Larry Cashdollar, an Akamai researcher, the first one to spot the malware, told ZDNet in a statement, "It's using known default credentials for IoT devices to log in and kill the system.” He added, “It's doing this by writing random data from /dev/random to any mounted storage it finds. I see in the binary it's calling fdisk -l which will list all disk partitions."  He added, "It then writes random data from /dev/random to any partitions it discovers." https://twitter.com/_larry0/status/1143532888538984448 It deletes the devices' firewall rules and then removes its network config and triggers a restart, this way the devices get bricked. Victims are advised to manually reinstall the device's firmware for recovering. This malware attack might remind you of the BrickerBot malware that ended up destroying millions of devices in 2017. Cashdollar told ZDNet in a statement, "It's targeting any Unix-like system with default login credentials." He further added, "The binary I captured targets ARM devices. I noticed it also had a Bash shell version available to download which would target any architecture running a Unix like OS." This also means that this malware might affect Linux servers if they have Telnet ports open and in case they are secured with poor or widely-used credentials. Also, as per the ZDNet report, the attacks were carried out from a VPS server that was owned by a company operating out of Iran. Cashdollar said, "It appears the IP address that targeted my honeypot is hosted on a VPS server owned by novinvps.com, which is operated out of Iran."  With the help of NewSky Security researcher Ankit Anubhav, ZDNet managed to reach out to the Silex malware author who goes by the pseudonym Light Leafon. According to Anubhav, Light Leafon, is a 14-year-old teenager responsible for this malware.  In a statement to Anubhav and ZDNet, he said, “The project started as a joke but has now developed into a full-time project, and has abandoned the old HITO botnet for Silex.” Light also said that he has plans for developing the Silex malware further and will add even more destructive functions. In a statement to Anubhav and ZDNet, he said, "It will be reworked to have the original BrickerBot functionality."  He is also planning to add the ability to log into devices via SSH apart from the current Telnet hijacking capability. He plans to give the malware the ability to use vulnerabilities for breaking into devices, which is quite similar to most of the IoT botnets. Light said, "My friend Skiddy and I are going to rework the whole bot.” He further added, "It is going to target every single publicly known exploit that Mirai or Qbot load." Light didn’t give any justification for his actions neither have put across any manifesto as the author of BrickerBot (goes with the pseudonym-Janit0r) did post before the BrickerBot attacks. Janit0r motivated the 2017 attacks to protest against owners of smart devices that were constantly getting infected with the Mirai DDoS malware. In a statement to ZDNet, Anubhav described the teenager as "one of the most prominent and talented IoT threat actors at the moment." He further added, "Its impressive and at the same time sad that Light, being a minor, is utilizing his talent in an illegal way." People are surprised how a 14-year-old managed to work this out and are equally worried about the consequences the kid might undergo. A user commented on Reddit, “He's a 14-year old kid who is a bit misguided in his ways and can easily be found. He admits to DDoSing Wix, Omegle, and Twitter for lols and then also selling a few spots on the net. Dude needs to calm down before it goes bad. Luckily he's under 18 so really the worst that would happen in the EU is a slap on the wrist.”  Another user commented, “It’s funny how those guys are like “what a skid lol” but like ... it’s a 14-year-old kid lol. What is it people say about the special olympics…” Few others said that developers need to be more vigilant and take security seriously. Another comment reads, “Hopefully manufacturers might start taking security seriously instead of churning out these vulnerable pieces of shit like it's going out of fashion (which it is).” To know more about this news, check out the report by ZDNet. WannaCry hero, Marcus Hutchins pleads guilty to malware charges; may face upto 10 years in prison FireEye reports infrastructure-crippling Triton malware linked to Russian government tech institute ASUS servers hijacked; pushed backdoor malware via software updates potentially affecting over a million users  

Microsoft has taken steps to release security updates for unsupported but still widely-used Windows operating systems like XP and Windows 2003. The company took this move as a part of its May 14 Patch Tuesday, due to the discovery of a “wormable” flaw that could be a major threat similar to the WannaCry ransomware attacks of 2017. The WannaCry ransomware threat was quick to spread across the world in May 2017 due to a vulnerability that was prevalent among systems running Windows XP and older versions of Windows. On Tuesday, Microsoft released 16 updates that target at least 79 security issues in Windows and related software. Now let’s have a look at the vulnerabilities,  CVE-2019-0708 and CVE-2019-0863. CVE-2019-0708, remote desktop services vulnerability The  CVE-2019-0708 vulnerability is in remote desktop services into supported versions of Windows, including Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, and Windows Server 2008. It is present in computers powered by Windows XP and Windows 2003. To attack the system, an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and then sends specially crafted requests. This security update now corrects how Remote Desktop Services handles connection requests. Though the vulnerability CVE-2019-0708 does not affect Microsoft’s latest operating systems, including,  Windows 10, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2012. The company hasn’t observed any evidence of attacks against this security flaw, but it might head off a serious and imminent threat. Simon Pope, director of incident response for the Microsoft Security Response Center said, “This vulnerability is pre-authentication and requires no user interaction. In other words, the vulnerability is ‘wormable,’ meaning that any future malware that exploits this vulnerability could propagate from vulnerable computer to vulnerable computer in a similar way as the WannaCry malware spread across the globe in 2017. It is important that affected systems are patched as quickly as possible to prevent such a scenario from happening.” CVE-2019-0863, zero-day vulnerability One of the security updates fixed a zero-day vulnerability, (CVE-2019-0863) in the Windows Error Reporting Service. An attacker who can successfully exploit this vulnerability can run arbitrary code in kernel mode.The attacker can then install programs; change, view, or delete data; or create new accounts with administrator privileges. An attacker has to gain unprivileged execution on the victim’s system in order to exploit the vulnerability. Microsoft’s security update addresses this vulnerability by correcting the way WER (Windows Error Reporting) handles files. According to Chris Goettl, director of product management for security vendor Ivanti, this vulnerability has already been seen in targeted attacks. Microsoft Office and Office365, Sharepoint, .NET Framework and SQL server are some of the other Microsoft products that received patches. To know more about this news, check out Microsoft’s page. #MSBuild2019: Microsoft launches new products to secure elections and political campaigns Microsoft Build 2019: Introducing Windows Terminal, application packed with multiple tab opening, improved text and more Microsoft Build 2019: Introducing WSL 2, the newest architecture for the Windows Subsystem for Linux  

Last week, a vulnerability was found in all the versions of Exim, a mail transfer agent (MTA), that when exploited can let attackers run malicious code with root privileges. According to the Exim team, all Exim servers running version 4.92.1 and the previous ones are vulnerable.  On September 4, the team at Exim published a warning on the Openwall information security mailing list regarding the critical security flaw that was affecting Exim. On Friday, the team at Exim released 4.92.2 to address this vulnerability. This vulnerability with the ID, CVE-2019-15846 was reported in July by a security researcher called Zerons. The vulnerability allows attackers to take advantage of the TLS ServerName Indicator and execute programs with root privileges on servers that accept TLS connections. An attacker can simply create a buffer overflow to gain access to a server running Exim as the bug doesn’t depend on the TLS library that is used by the server, both GnuTLS, as well as OpenSSL, get affected. It is used to serve around 57% of all publicly reachable email servers over the internet. Exim was initially designed for Unix servers, is currently available for Linux and Microsoft Corp. Windows and is also used for the email in cPanel.  Exim's advisory says, "In the default runtime configuration, this is exploitable with crafted ServerName Indication (SNI) data during a TLS negotiation.”  Read Also: A year-old Webmin backdoor revealed at DEF CON 2019 allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute commands with root privileges on servers Server owners can mitigate by disabling TLS support for the Exim server but it would expose email traffic in cleartext and would make it vulnerable to sniffing attacks and interception. Also, this mitigation plan can be more dangerous for the Exim owners living in the EU, since it might lead their companies to data leaks, and the subsequent GDPR fines. Also, Exim installations do not have the TLS support enabled by default but the Exim instances with Linux distros ship with TLS enabled by default.  Exim instances that ship with cPanel also support TLS by default but the cPanel staff have moved towards integrating the Exim patch into a cPanel update that they already started rolling it out to customers. Read Also: A vulnerability found in Jira Server and Data Center allows attackers to remotely execute code on systems A similar vulnerability named as CVE-2019-13917 was found in July that impacted Exim 4.85 up to and including 4.92 and got patched with the release of 4.92.1. Even this vulnerability would allow remote attackers to execute programs with root privileges. In June, the team at Exim had patched CVE-2019-10149, a vulnerability that is called "Return of the Wizard," that allowed attackers to run malicious code with root privileges on remote Exim servers. Also, Microsoft had issued a warning in June regarding a Linux worm that was targeting Azure Linux VMs that were running vulnerable Exim versions. Most of the users are sceptical about the meditation plan as they are not comfortable around disabling the TLS as the mitigation option. A user commented on HackerNews, “No kidding? Turning off TLS isn't an option at many installations. It's gotta work.” Other interesting news in Security  CircleCI reports of a security breach and malicious database in a third-party vendor account Hundreds of millions of Facebook users’ phone numbers found online, thanks to an exposed server, TechCrunch reports Espressif IoT devices susceptible to WiFi vulnerabilities can allow hijackers to crash devices connected to enterprise networks    

Hyatt Hotels Corporation launched its bug bounty program with HackerOne, earlier this week. As part of the bug bounty program, ethical hackers are invited to test Hyatt websites and apps to spot potential vulnerabilities in them. “At Hyatt, protecting guest and customer information is our top priority and launching this program represents an important step that furthers our goal of keeping our guests safe every day,” stated Hyatt Chief Information Security Officer Benjamin Vaughn. Hyatt Hotels Corporation is headquartered in Chicago and is a leading global hospitality company comprising a portfolio of 14 premier brands. Hyatt’s portfolio includes more than 750 properties in more than 55 countries across six continents. Hyatt decided to choose HackerOne bug bounty program after conducting a deep review of the bug bounty marketplace. The Bug Bounty program by HackerOne rewards friendly hackers who help discover security vulnerabilities in various important software on the internet. Hyatt is the first in the hotel industry to launch bug bounty program. “By being the first organization in the hospitality industry to embrace the collaborative efforts of global security researchers, Hyatt hopes to continue to raise its already high level of security standards as well as learn from and collaborate with security researchers”, stated the Hyatt team. The bug bounty program launched by Hyatt with Hackerone was originally available as an invite-only private program where it paid the hackers about $5600 in bounties (bug bounty rewards). This has changed as the bug bounty program is now public. Hackers are allowed to search for vulnerabilities on hyatt.com domain, www.hyatt.com,  m.hyatt.com, world.hyatt.com, and on Hyatt’s mobile apps for iOS and Android. The company will be paying hackers $4000 for spotting critical vulnerabilities, and $300 for low severity issues. The company will be rewarding hackers for tracking vulnerabilities such as novel Origin IP address discovery, authentication bypass, back-end system access via front-end systems, business logic bypass, container escape, SQL Injection, cross-site request forgery, exploitable cross-site scripting, and WAF bypass, among other issues. “Bug bounty programs are a proven method for advancing an organization’s cybersecurity defenses. In today’s connected society, vulnerabilities will always be present. Organizations like Hyatt are leading the way by taking this essential step to secure the data they are trusted to hold”, said HackerOne CEO Marten Mickos. EU to sponsor bug bounty programs for 14 open source projects from January 2019 Airtable, a Slack-like coding platform for non-techies, raises $100 million in funding The ‘Flock’ program provides grants to Aragon teams worth $1 million

Recently, Cisco and Huawei had faced a major breach in their routers where attackers used two different bypass methods. Hackers managed to compromise Cisco routers through a backdoor attack while Huawei was a victim of botnets. This year has been crucial for big players targeted with modern cyber attacks like Meltdown and Spectre. Who would have ever imagined a CD being the cause of a security breach in the year 2018. However, this time hackers have taken an old school approach or must I say one of the most unexpected methods of opening a backdoor to sensitive information. Packages with China postmarks had ended-up at several local and state government offices. The envelope contained a rambling letter and a small CD. The letter included lengthy paragraphs about fireworks, parades, and film industry but nothing in particular. While the CD contained a set of Word files that consisted of script-based malware. These scripts were supposed to run when the government officials would access them on their computers, eventually compromising that system. Well, people usually end up with blunders when they are confused or curious. The hackers knew exactly how to kick the victims curiosity and confusion into high gear. Until now, State Department of Cultural Affairs, State Historical Societies, and State Archives have received these packages addressed specifically to them. The MS-ISAC claim that these CDs included Mandarin language Microsoft Word (.doc) files from which a few include malicious Visual Basic scripts. It’s not very clear if anyone was tricked into inserting the disk in government systems. Well, it's common sense that you don’t insert a random disk into your system, but that’s not always the case. In 2016, a study found 50% of people plugging-in random USB devices into their system found at public places. The government agencies receiving these packages look quite strange but may be the hackers are looking at breaching a system where they won’t be detected easily; the perfect spot to quickly attack a bigger target. Human curiosity can lead to an invention or a disaster, but, in the security chain, humans are considered as the most delicate link. It’s quite obvious to not insert a random storage device into your systems, but here the hackers have shelled a little cash to target victims still using CD-ROMs in this modern age.  Now the only thing state agencies can hope for is that no one accidentally or out of curiosity inserts disks or USB devices of unknown origin into government systems. Related Links Top 5 cybersecurity trends you should be aware of in 2018 Intel’s Spectre variant 4 patch impacts CPU performance NetSpectre attack exploits data from CPU memory

Two days ago, Check Point researchers reported a new mobile malware attack called ‘Agent Smith’ which infected around 25 million Android devices. This malware is being used for financial gains through the use of malicious advertisements. The malware, concealed under the identity of a Google related app, exploited known Android vulnerabilities and automatically replaced installed apps with their malicious versions, without any consent of the user. The primary targets of this malware are based in Asian countries, especially India with over 15 million infected devices, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, UK and around 300k devices infected in the U.S. Currently, no malicious apps remain on the Google Play Store. However, before being removed, the malicious apps were downloaded over 10 million times. Researchers have estimated over 2.8 billion infections in total, on around 25 Million unique devices. Image Source: Check Point Research How Agent Smith infected Android apps A preliminary investigation revealed that the app strongly resembled Janus vulnerability abuse which was discovered in 2017 and allowed attackers to modify the code in Android applications without affecting their signatures. These malicious apps had the ability to hide their app icons and claim to be Google related updaters or vending modules. Check Point researchers found that  Agent Smith’s attack also resembled previous malware campaigns against Android apps, like Gooligan, HummingBad, and CopyCat. The Agent Smith malware basically attacks in a step by step manner: Image Source: Check Point Research Firstly, a dropper app attracts a victim to install itself voluntarily. The dropper has an inbuilt Feng Shui Bundle which works as an encrypted asset file. The dropper variants include photo utility, games, or sex-related apps. Next, the dropper automatically decrypts and installs its core malware APK, which is usually disguised as Google Updater, Google Update for U or ‘com.google.vending’.  This core malware APK is then used to conduct malicious patching and app updates. The core malware’s icon is hidden from the user, at all times. Lastly, the core malware extracts the device’s installed app list. If the malware finds apps like Whatsapp, Flipkart, Jio, Truecaller, etc on its prey list (hard-coded or sent from C&C server), the malware extracts the base APK of the target innocent app on the device. Next, the malware patches the APK with malicious ads modules. The base APK is then installed back, making it seem like an update. During the final update installation process, Agent Smith relies on the Janus vulnerability to bypass Android’s APK integrity checks. Finally, Agent Smith hijacks the compromised user apps, to show malicious advertisements. The hackers have used Agent Smith for financial gain only until now. However, with its ability to hide its icon from the launcher and successfully impersonate any popular existing app on a device, Agent Smith can cause serious harms like banking credential theft, shopping, and other sensitive apps. It has also come to light that Google had fixed Janus vulnerability, in 2017 but the fix has not made its way onto every Android phone. “Android users should use ad blocker software, always update their devices when prompted, and only download apps from the Google Play Store”, said Dustin Childs, the communications manager at a cybersecurity company Trend Micro. Many Android users have expressed their concern about the Agent Smith malware attack. https://twitter.com/TMWB1/status/1149337833695600640 https://twitter.com/AkiSolomos/status/1149487532272312324 Few iOS users, now say that its Google’s security vulnerabilities that make users opt for iOS phones. A Redditor comments, “This is unfortunately why I am still an Apple customer. I do not trust android to keep my information safe. Hey Google, how about I pay you a $15 per month subscription and you stop using spyware on me?” According to the researchers, the malware appears to be run by a Chinese Internet company located in Guangzhou that claims to help Chinese Android developers publish and promote their apps on overseas platforms. Check Point researchers have submitted their report to Google and law enforcement units, to facilitate further investigation. The names of the malicious actors have not yet been revealed. Google has not yet released any official statement warning Android users about the Agent Smith malware attack. For more details about the attack, head over to Check Point research page. An IoT worm Silex, developed by a 14 year old resulted in malware attack and taking down 2000 devices China is forcing tourists crossing Xinjiang borders to install an Android app that sends personal information to authorities, reports the Vice News React Native 0.60 releases with accessibility improvements, AndroidX support, and more