The difference between A2C and A3C is that A2C performs synchronous updates. Here, all the workers will wait until they have completed the collection of experiences and computed the gradients. Only after this are the global (or master) network's parameters updated. This is different from A3C, where the update is performed asynchronously, that is, where the worker threads do not wait for the others to finish. A2C is easier to code than A3C, but that is not undertaken here. If you are interested in this, you are encouraged to take the preceding A3C code and convert it to A2C, after which the performance of both algorithms can be compared.
United States
Great Britain
India
Germany
France
Canada
Russia
Spain
Brazil
Australia
Singapore
Hungary
Philippines
Mexico
Thailand
Ukraine
Luxembourg
Estonia
Lithuania
Norway
Chile
South Korea
Ecuador
Colombia
Taiwan
Switzerland
Indonesia
Cyprus
Denmark
Finland
Poland
Malta
Czechia
New Zealand
Austria
Turkey
Sweden
Italy
Egypt
Belgium
Portugal
Slovenia
Ireland
Romania
Greece
Argentina
Malaysia
South Africa
Netherlands
Bulgaria
Latvia
Japan
Slovakia