Methodologies rarely consider why a penetration test is being undertaken or what data is critical to the business and needs to be protected. In the absence of this vital first step, penetration tests lose focus.
Many penetration testers are reluctant to follow a defined methodology, fearing that it will hinder their creativity in exploiting a network. Pentesting fails to reflect the actual activities of a malicious attacker. Frequently, the client wants to see whether you can gain administrative access to a particular system (perhaps they want to see whether you can root the box, for instance). However, the attacker may be focused on copying critical data in a manner that does not require root access or cause a denial of service.
To address the limitations inherent in formal testing methodologies, they must be integrated in a framework that views the network from the perspective of an attacker, the kill chain.
In 2009, Mike Cloppert of Lockheed Martin CERT introduced the concept that is now known as the attacker kill chain. This concept includes the steps taken by an adversary when they attack a network. These attacks do not always proceed in a linear way; some steps may occur in parallel. Multiple attacks may be launched over time against the same target, and stages may overlap.
In this book, we have modified Cloppert's kill chain concept to more accurately reflect how attackers apply these steps when exploiting networks, applications, and data services.
The following diagram shows the typical kill chain of an attacker:
A typical kill chain of an attacker can be described as follows:
- The reconnaissance phase: The adage "reconnaissance time is never wasted time," adopted by most military organizations, acknowledges that it is better to learn as much as possible about an enemy before engaging them. For the same reason, attackers will conduct extensive reconnaissance of a target before attacking. In fact, it is estimated that at least 70 percent of the work of a penetration test or attack is spent conducting reconnaissance! Generally, a penetration tester or attacker will employ two types of reconnaissance:
- Passive reconnaissance: In this, the attacker does not directly interact with the target in a hostile manner. For example, the attacker will review the publicly available website(s), assess online media (especially social media sites), and attempt to determine the attack surface of the target. One particular task will be generating a list of names of past and current employees. These names will form the basis of attempts to brute-force or guess passwords. They will also be used in social engineering attacks. This type of reconnaissance is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from the behavior of regular users.
- Active reconnaissance: This can be detected by the target, but not without some difficulty. Activities occurring during active reconnaissance include physical visits to target premises, port scanning, and remote vulnerability scanning.
- The delivery phase: Delivery entails the selection and development of the weapon that will be used to complete the exploit during the attack. The exact weapon chosen will depend on the attacker's intent as well as the route of delivery (for example, across the network, via wireless, or through a web-based service). The impact of the delivery phase will be examined in the second half of this book.
- The exploit or compromise phase: This is the point where a particular exploit is successfully applied, allowing attackers to reach their objective. The compromise may have occurred in a single phase (for example, when a known operating system vulnerability was exploited using a buffer overflow), or it may have been a multiphase compromise. (For example, say an attacker physically accesses premises to steal a corporate phone book. The names could be used to create lists for brute-force attacks against a login portal. In addition, emails could be sent to all employees asking them to click on an embedded link to download a crafted PDF file that compromises their computers.) Multiphase attacks are the norm when a malicious attacker targets a specific enterprise.
- Post-exploit (action on the objective): This is frequently and incorrectly referred to as the exfiltration phase, because there is a focus on perceiving attacks solely as a means to steal sensitive data (such as login information, personal information, and financial information); it is common for an attacker to have a different objective. For example, a business may wish to cause a denial of service in their competitor's network to drive customers to their own website. Therefore, this phase must focus on the many possible actions of an attacker. One of the most common exploit activities is when the attackers attempt to improve their access privileges to the highest possible level (vertical escalation) and to compromise as many accounts as possible (horizontal escalation).
- Post-exploit (persistence): If there is any value in compromising a network or system, then that value can likely be increased if there is persistent access. This allows attackers to maintain communications with a compromised system. From a defender's point of view, this is the part of the kill chain that is usually the easiest to detect.
Kill chains are metamodels of an attacker's behavior when they attempt to compromise a network or a particular data system. As a metamodel, kill chains can incorporate any proprietary or commercial pentesting methodology. Unlike the aforementioned methodologies, however, it ensures a strategic focus on how an attacker approaches the network. This focus on the attacker's activities will guide the layout and content of this book.
